Polyaspartic and polyurea floors are both types of protective coatings used for concrete surfaces, but they have several key differences:

Chemical Composition

Polyaspartic coatings are a subset of polyurea, specifically an aliphatic polyurea. This means they are formulated to be UV stable, which prevents yellowing or fading when exposed to sunlight.

Polyurea is generally aromatic and can be less resistant to UV rays unless specifically formulated otherwise, which might lead to discoloration over time.

Curing Time

Polyaspartic has a slightly longer pot life and curing time than traditional polyurea, offering more time for application and leveling before drying. This feature makes polyaspartic easier to apply, especially for decorative finishes like chip broadcasting.

Polyurea cures extremely quickly, often in just a few minutes, which can be a disadvantage if the coating needs to be spread evenly over a large area because there's less time to correct application errors.

Durability and Flexibility

Both types are known for their durability, chemical resistance, and flexibility. However, polyaspartic might offer better adhesion to concrete due to its slower curing time, which allows for better penetration into the concrete surface.

Polyurea, while also very durable, can be more challenging to apply due to its rapid curing, potentially leading to issues like poor adhesion if not applied correctly.

Application

Polyaspartic is often used as a topcoat over polyurea due to its UV stability and slower cure time, which allows for a more controlled application.

Polyurea is typically used as a base coat in these systems because of its quick curing properties, which can be beneficial in certain industrial applications where speed is critical.

Cost and Use

Polyaspartic tends to be more expensive than polyurea due to its advanced properties like UV resistance and longer pot life. It's favored for applications where appearance is crucial, like in decorative concrete where maintaining color and gloss is important.

Polyurea might be chosen for applications that prioritize quick installation and don't require the same level of UV stability, like industrial or commercial settings with less exposure to sunlight.

In summary, while both are high-performance coatings, polyaspartic is generally preferred for its UV stability, ease of application, and aesthetic qualities, whereas polyurea might be chosen for its rapid curing and in scenarios where UV exposure is not a concern.

Don't go it alone, give our team a call today and let's get started now!